See Prince Charles’ Watercolors of Landscapes Around the World | Smart News

watercolor painting of cloudy day and a gray worn down building overlooking seascape
This watercolor of Huna Mill in Scotland is a single of 79 paintings by Prince Charles on screen at the Garrison Chapel in London.
The Prince’s Basis

The premier-ever exhibition of paintings by Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, is currently on display screen in London. On check out at the Garrison Chapel in the former Chelsea Barracks through February 14, it attributes 79 watercolors of landscapes in England, Scotland, France, Tanzania and much more, studies Laura Elston for the Scotsman.

The Prince’s Basis, an educational charity established by Charles in 1986, structured the showcase, which is explained in a assertion as the to start with “full exhibition” of his artwork. Charles formerly exhibited 50 of his watercolors at Hampton Court docket Palace in 1998 and 30 at the Nationwide Gallery of Australia in 2018.

picture of elderly white man in blue pinstripe suit and purple tie with white flowers

Prince Charles is viewed as just one of the most successful living watercolor artists in the United Kingdom.

Arnaud Bouissou by using Flickr under CC0 

In wall textual content composed for the exhibition and quoted in the statement, Charles explains how watercolor portray permits him to refocus his energies:

[Y]ou turn out to be progressively knowledgeable of things that may well have escaped your interest previously—things like the quality of light and shade, of tone and texture and of the form of properties in relation to the landscape. It all necessitates the most powerful focus and, consequently, is just one of the most relaxing and therapeutic physical exercises I know.

According to Theo Farrant of Euronews, the prince started off experimenting with the medium in the 1970s after knowing that photography—a passion of his mom, Elizabeth II—failed to present him that exact same feeling of creative expression.

“Quite simply, I knowledgeable an frustrating urge to specific what I noticed by way of the medium of watercolor and to convey that almost ‘inner’ perception of texture, which is difficult to accomplish by means of pictures,” the royal suggests in the wall textual content.

Robert Waddell, an artwork instructor at the Gordonstoun boarding college in Scotland, launched Charles to portray during his university student yrs in the 1960s. The prince later on reviewed approach with the late British watercolorist Edward Seago and took lessons with notable artists Derek Hill, John Ward and Bryan Organ, as Lucy Davies documented for the Telegraph in 2018.

Nevertheless Charles says he is “appalled” by the quality of his previously will work, he believes his approach has improved over the several years. At the very same time, the prince argues that the therapeutic added benefits available by watercolor portray considerably outweigh any notion that his artwork could possibly be of a higher common of high-quality.

watercolor painting of snowcapped mountains

A landscape by Prince Charles of Haughs in Glen Callater of Scotland.

The Prince’s Foundation

“I am less than no illusion that my sketches depict fantastic artwork or a burgeoning expertise,” he writes in the wall text. “They represent, extra than anything at all else, my unique form of ‘photograph album’ and, as these types of, signify a great offer to me.”

A self-described “enthusiastic novice,” Charles is actually 1 of the most financially successful living artists in the United Kingdom. In between 1997 and 2016, an investigation by the Telegraph’s Robert Mendick observed that prints of the prince’s paintings sold for a whole of a lot more than £6 million (all over $8.9 million currently). All proceeds went to the Prince’s Foundation, which supports a vary of charitable endeavors.

Other British royals have engaged in creative pursuits in the previous. In 2015, Charles’s niece, Princess Eugenie, joined the Hauser & Wirth gallery as an artwork director. She has shared various watercolors of her personal on her Instagram account, like a portray of a pink flower on Environment Art Working day in 2020, experiences Stephanie Petit for Men and women. Queen Victoria, Charles’ wonderful-terrific-fantastic-grandmother, was also a renowned watercolorist. Past calendar year, the Royal Assortment Have confidence in exhibited a array of watercolors collected and commissioned by the queen and her husband, Prince Albert.

Ambitious proposals to strengthen our protected landscapes announced

Plans to increase mother nature restoration and safeguard England’s iconic countrywide parks for foreseeable future generations have been set out today by Setting Secretary George Eustice.

The proposals, which will be topic to consultation, are established out in the Government’s response to Julian Glover’s unbiased Landscapes Evaluate which seemed at whether the protections for Nationwide Parks and Locations of Remarkable Normal Splendor (AONBs) are however match for goal. The Government’s response sets out bold modifications to increase accessibility to nature and make certain guarded landscapes can produce a lot more for weather, character, folks and destinations for the future 70 years and outside of, as we make back again greener from the pandemic and degree up all elements of the nation.

A new countrywide landscapes partnership will bring collectively those responsible for running England’s Countrywide Parks and AONBs to collaborate, share awareness and deal with frequent targets these as character restoration and enhanced community access.

By harnessing their collective strengths whilst preserving their independence, the partnership will aid community leadership to do the job jointly nationally, like by carrying out campaigns, organising situations and giving volunteering prospects that bring folks nearer to mother nature.

The 12-week consultation will also ask for sights on proposals to generate nature restoration within our landscapes and assistance for the communities that live and get the job done within just them, these kinds of as the design and supply of new agri-natural environment strategies and an formidable administration strategy for just about every space.

This announcement kinds aspect of the Government’s wider action to get well and restore character, providing on the pledge inside of the 25 Calendar year Environment Prepare to guard 30{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} of the UK’s land by 2030 and commitments to reach web zero by 2050.

Atmosphere Secretary George Eustice explained:

Our Nationwide Parks and Locations of Superb Purely natural Attractiveness are among our nation’s greatest and most cherished natural miracles. The complete established of actions established out now signifies a new chapter in the tale of our safeguarded landscapes and we have worked carefully with stakeholders to cautiously sort our reaction.

These reforms will perform a pivotal job in assembly our intercontinental dedication to defend 30{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} of land for biodiversity by 2030 as we make again greener.

The bundle of actions announced now reflects numerous of Julian Glover’s suggestions, as component of a renewed and strengthened target on nature recovery in our secured landscapes and to make them greener and more available to anyone.

Chair of Organic England, Tony Juniper reported:

From the magnificence of the sandy beach locations of the Scillies to the rugged glory of Northumberland, our guarded landscapes are integral to our national id, our wellness and wellbeing and our country’s prosperity.

As Government’s statutory landscape advisor, Normal England has a pivotal part in building sure our Countrywide Parks and AONBs are lovely, thriving locations. We welcome this package of measures which will enable them produce even much more for the whole of modern society and overcome the twin difficulties of local climate adjust and biodiversity decline. We glimpse forward to enjoying a leading function in the countrywide landscapes partnership and doing work intently with Govt, safeguarded landscape bodies and stakeholders to deliver these bold proposals.

Julian Glover, who led the overview, stated:

This is our prospect to make England’s landscapes more stunning, improved for folks who take a look at and stay in them and much much more alive with character. Our countryside is there for all of us, but from the heaths of the New Forest to the substantial fells of the Lake District, it is less than force in an city entire world. It will not be more than enough just to check out to conserve what we have inherited – we can improve the story from decrease to restoration, to make them greener, extra welcoming and total of hope. The overview I led confirmed what desires to be carried out and I’m pleased the Governing administration has agreed to act.

Protected landscapes participate in an important purpose in tackling local weather change, protecting biodiversity, and supporting the nation’s well being and wellbeing. Proof from Natural England reveals that just about 50 {6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} the populace say that they are expending more time outdoors than just before the pandemic, while the greater part of grown ups surveyed by Forest Study agreed that their degree of joy when in character has amplified.

Nonetheless, the pandemic has also highlighted the inequalities of accessibility to greenspaces, with evidence from Pure England demonstrating that about a third of all those on the least expensive incomes frequented a purely natural space in a usual week in the course of the pandemic, as opposed to just about 60{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} among those on high incomes. Today’s actions goal to enhance people’s obtain to character, so far more of England can profit from obtaining obtain to stunning character-loaded landscapes.

Recognising the will need to elevate the profile of terrific British landscapes – significantly AONBs – as nationwide property, the 12-week session will also seek out sights on proposals, which includes:

  • inspire enhanced obtain to our shielded landscapes and mother nature for all components of culture, notably where by this supports improved community well being and wellbeing
  • proceed support for the regional communities that reside and get the job done in protected landscapes, encouraging preserve our heritage for potential generations
  • drive mother nature recovery and nature-primarily based options within just protected landscapes to aid tackle the twin worries of biodiversity loss and local climate transform and
  • use structural adjustments and methods to support our protected landscapes in offering more for nature, climate, persons and places.

The session closes on Saturday 9 April 2022 and can be identified below.

Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ landscapes in Italy

  • 1.

    Fernandez, R. J. Do humans create deserts?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 6–7 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. Bioscience 54(9), 817–829 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Imeson, A. Desertification, Land Degradation and Sustainability (Routledge, 2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Romm, J. Desertification: The next dust bowl. Nature 478, 450–451 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Portnov, B. A. & Safriel, U. N. Combating desertification in the Negev: Dryland agriculture vs. dryland urbanization. J. Arid Environ. 56, 659–680 (2004).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Salvati, L., Bajocco, S., Ceccarelli, T., Zitti, M. & Perini, L. Towards a process-based evaluation of land vulnerability to soil degradation in Italy. Ecol. Ind. 11(5), 1216–1227 (2011).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Santini, M., Caccamo, G., Laurenti, A., Noce, S. & Valentini, R. A multi-model GIS framework for desertification risk assessment. Appl. Geogr. 30(3), 394–415 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Bajocco, S., Salvati, L. & Ricotta, C. Land degradation vs. Fire: A spiral process?. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35(1), 3–18 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Incerti, G., Feoli, E., Salvati, L., Brunetti, A. & Giovacchini, A. Analysis of bioclimatic time series and their neural network-based classification to characterise drought risk patterns in South Italy. Int. J. Biometeorol. 51(4), 253–263 (2007).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Salvati, L., Perini, L., Sabbi, A. & Bajocco, S. Climate Aridity and land use changes: A regional-scale analysis. Geogr. Res. 50(2), 193–203 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Coluzzi, R. et al. Investigating climate variability and long-term vegetation activity across heterogeneous Basilicata agroecosystems. Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk 10(1), 168–180 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Imbrenda, V. et al. Analysis of landscape evolution in a vulnerable coastal area under natural and human pressure. Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk 9(1), 1249–1279 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Imbrenda, V. et al. Land degradation and metropolitan expansion in a peri-urban environment. Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk 12(1), 1797–1818 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Kairis, O., Karavitis, C., Kounalaki, A., Salvati, L. & Kosmas, C. The effect of land management practices on soil erosion and land desertification in an olive grove. Soil Use Manag. 29(4), 597–606 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Kairis, O., Karavitis, C., Salvati, L., Kounalaki, A. & Kosmas, K. Exploring the impact of overgrazing on soil erosion and land degradation in a dry Mediterranean agro-forest landscape (Crete, Greece). Arid Land Res. Manag. 29(3), 360–374 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Karamesouti, M. et al. Land-use and land degradation processes affecting soil resources: Evidence from a traditional Mediterranean cropland (Greece). CATENA 132, 45–55 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Kosmas, C. et al. Land degradation and long-term changes in agro-pastoral systems: An empirical analysis of ecological resilience in Asteroussia-Crete (Greece). CATENA 147, 196–204 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Jongman, R. H. G. Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: Ecological consequences and solutions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 58(2), 211–221 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Lavado Contador, J. F., Schnabel, S., Gomez Gutierrez, A. & Pulido Fernandez, M. Mapping sensitivity to land degradation in Extremadura, SW Spain. Land Degrad. Dev. 20(2), 129–144 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Otto, R., Krusi, B. O. & Kienast, F. Degradation of an arid coastal landscape in relation to land use changes in southern Tenerife (Canary Islands). J. Arid Environ. 70, 527–539 (2007).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Braje, T. J., Leppard, T. P., Fitzpatrick, S. M. & Erlandson, J. M. Archaeology, historical ecology and anthropogenic island ecosystems. Environ. Conserv. 44(3), 286–297 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Rick, T., Ontiveros, M. Á. C., Jerardino, A., Mariotti, A., Méndez, C. & Williams, A. N. Human-environmental interactions in Mediterranean climate regions from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 100253 (2020).

  • 23.

    Bajocco, S., Ceccarelli, T., Smiraglia, D., Salvati, L. & Ricotta, C. Modeling the ecological niche of long-term land use changes: The role of biophysical factors. Ecol. Ind. 60, 231–236 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Antrop, M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 67(1), 9–26 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Bakra, N., Weindorf, D. C., Bahnassy, M. H. & El-Badawi, M. M. Multi-temporal assessment of land sensitivity to desertification in a fragile agro-ecosystem: Environmental indicators. Ecol. Ind. 15(1), 271–280 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Pacheco, F. A. L., Fernandes, L. F. S., Junior, R. F. V., Valera, C. A. & Pissarra, T. C. T. Land degradation: Multiple environmental consequences and routes to neutrality. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 5, 79–86 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Gomes, E. et al. Agricultural land fragmentation analysis in a peri-urban context: From the past into the future. Ecol. Ind. 97, 380–388 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Gulcin, D. & Yilmaz, K. T. The assessment of landscape fragmentation in an agricultural environment: Degradation or contribution to ecosystem services?. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 25(12), 7941–7950 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Pili, S., Grigoriadis, E., Carlucci, M., Clemente, M. & Salvati, L. Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol. Ind. 76, 71–80 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A. & Clobert, J. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1(2), 1–9 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Kouba, Y., Gartzia, M., El Aich, A. & Alados, C. L. Deserts do not advance, they are created: Land degradation and desertification in semiarid environments in the Middle Atlas, Morocco. J. Arid Environ. 158, 1–8 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Nagendra, H., Munroe, D. K. & Southworth, J. From pattern to process: Landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 101(2), 111–115 (2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Lin, Y., Han, G., Zhao, M. & Chang, S. X. Spatial vegetation patterns as early signs of desertification: A case study of a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Landsc. Ecol. 25(10), 1519–1527 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Kéfi, S. et al. Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems. Nature 449(7159), 213–217 (2007).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Girvetz, E. H., Thorne, J. H., Berry, A. M. & Jaeger, J. A. Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 86(3), 205–218 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Hargis, C. D., Bissonette, J. A. & David, J. L. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landsc. Ecol. 13(3), 167–186 (1998).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Llausàs, A. & Nogué, J. Indicators of landscape fragmentation: The case for combining ecological indices and the perceptive approach. Ecol. Ind. 15(1), 85–91 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Salvati, L. & Zitti, M. The environmental “risky” region: Identifying land degradation processes through integration of socio-economic and ecological indicators in a multivariate regionalization model. Environ. Manage. 44(5), 888 (2009).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Ferrara, A. et al. Updating the MEDALUS-ESA framework for worldwide land degradation and desertification assessment. Land Degrad. Dev. 31(12), 1593–1607 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Delfanti, L. et al. Solar plants, environmental degradation and local socioeconomic contexts: A case study in a Mediterranean country. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 61, 88–93 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Cowie, A. L. et al. Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. Environ. Sci. Policy 79, 25–35 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Lanfredi, M. et al. A geostatistics-assisted approach to the deterministic approximation of climate data. Environ. Model. Softw. 66, 69–77 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Coluzzi, R. et al. Density matters? Settlement expansion and land degradation in Peri-urban and rural districts of Italy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 92, 106703 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z. & Lv, T. A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land 9(1), 28 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Ferrara, A., Salvati, L., Sateriano, A. & Nolè, A. Performance evaluation and costs assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability. Ecol. Ind. 23, 123–129 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Salvati, L. From simplicity to complexity: The changing geography of land vulnerability to degradation in Italy. Geogr. Res. 51(3), 318–328 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Salvati, L. et al. Italy’s renewable water resources as estimated on the basis of the monthly water balance. Irrig. Drain. J. Int. Commiss. Irrig. Drain. 57(5), 507–515 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Salvati, L. et al. Assessing the effectiveness of sustainable land management policies for combating desertification: A data mining approach. J. Environ. Manage. 183, 754–762 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Recanatesi, F. et al. A fifty-year sustainability assessment of Italian agro-forest districts. Sustainability 8(1), 32 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Bajocco, S., De Angelis, A. & Salvati, L. A satellite-based green index as a proxy for vegetation cover quality in a Mediterranean region. Ecol. Ind. 23, 578–587 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Smiraglia, D. et al. The latent relationship between soil vulnerability to degradation and land fragmentation: A statistical analysis of landscape metrics in Italy, 1960–2010. Environ. Manage. 64(2), 154–165 (2019).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Smiraglia, D., Ceccarelli, T., Bajocco, S., Salvati, L. & Perini, L. Linking trajectories of land change, land degradation processes and ecosystem services. Environ. Res. 147, 590–600 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Zambon, I., Benedetti, A., Ferrara, C. & Salvati, L. Soil matters? A multivariate analysis of socioeconomic constraints to urban expansion in Mediterranean Europe. Ecol. Econ. 146, 173–183 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Zambon, I. et al. Land quality, sustainable development and environmental degradation in agricultural districts: A computational approach based on entropy indexes. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 64, 37–46 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Basso, B. et al. Evaluating responses to land degradation mitigation measures in Southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. 6(2), 367–380 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Salvati, L. & Zitti, M. Land degradation in the Mediterranean Basin: Linking bio-physical and economic factors into an ecological perspective. Biota 6, 67–77 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Qi, Y. et al. Temporal-spatial variability of desertification in an agro-pastoral transitional zone of northern Shaanxi Province, China. CATENA 88(1), 37–45 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Sklenicka, P. Classification of farmland ownership fragmentation as a cause of land degradation: A review on typology, consequences, and remedies. Land Use Policy 57, 694–701 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Vos, W. & Meekes, H. Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc. Urban Plan. 46(1), 3–14 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Mao, D. et al. Land degradation and restoration in the arid and semiarid zones of China: Quantified evidence and implications from satellites. Land Degrad. Dev. 29(11), 3841–3851 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Symeonakis, E., Calvo-Cases, A. & Arnau-Rosalen, E. Land use change and land degradation in southeastern Mediterranean Spain. Environ. Manage. 40(1), 80–94 (2007).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Ibanez, J., Martinez Valderrama, J. & Puigdefabregas, J. Assessing desertification risk using system stability condition analysis. Ecol. Model. 213, 180–190 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Hill, J., Stellmes, M., Udelhoven, T., Röder, A. & Sommer, S. Mediterranean desertification and land degradation: Mapping related land use change syndromes based on satellite observations. Global Planet. Change 64(3), 146–157 (2008).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Sommer, S. et al. Application of indicator systems for monitoring and assessment of desertification from national to global scales. Land Degrad. Dev. 22(2), 184–197 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Vogt, J. V. et al. Monitoring and Assessment of Land Degradation and Desertification: Towards new conceptual and integrated approaches. Land Degrad. Dev. 22(2), 150–165 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Scarascia, M. V., Battista, F. D. & Salvati, L. Water resources in Italy: Availability and agricultural uses. Irrig. Drain. J. Int. Commiss. Irrig. Drain. 55(2), 115–127 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Wang, H., Yuan, H., Xu, X. & Liu, S. Landscape structure of desertification grassland in source region of Yellow River. J. Appl. Ecol. 17(9), 1665–1670 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Wang, J. et al. Spatio-temporal pattern of land degradation from 1990 to 2015 in Mongolia. Environ. Dev. 34, 100497 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Briassoulis, H. Governing desertification in Mediterranean Europe: The challenge of environmental policy integration in multi-level governance contexts. Land Degrad. Dev. 22(3), 313–325 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Juntti, M. & Wilson, G. A. Conceptualising desertification in Southern Europe: Stakeholder interpretations and multiple policy agendas. Eur. Environ. 15, 228–249 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Gisladottir, G. & Stocking, M. Land degradation control and its global environmental benefits. Land Degrad. Dev. 16, 99–112 (2005).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Artist Captures the Beauty of All 50 States in Series of Landscapes

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    25 paintings from the “50 States” series
    This post may contain affiliate links. If you make a purchase, My Modern Met may earn an affiliate commission. Please read our disclosure for more info.

    Visiting all 50 states of the U.S. is a goal for many people, but making the trip to each one isn’t easy. However, even if traveling may be difficult, there are other ways to tour these places. Texas-based artist Emily Kenney celebrates the natural beauty of the United States by painting a landscape or seascape for each state.

    The completed series, aptly entitled 50 States, depicts the scenery of California, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and more in Kenney’s airy, impressionistic painting style. The artist was inspired to embark on this project after moving from Michigan to Texas in 2020. The limitations of the pandemic forced her to spend more time indoors, so she used her painting skills to travel to some of the most beautiful natural places across the United States. “I decided to create work that would bring the outdoors in, and document the beauty that can be found wherever you may live,” Kenney tells My Modern Met. This initial idea then blossomed into the 50 States series.

    Since Kenney wasn’t able to travel as much as she wanted to, she had to find other ways to sightsee. “I didn’t set any specific requirements for choosing my state landscapes besides wanting to find the most beautiful, natural places (no cityscapes) that I could from each state,” Kenney continues. “I enjoy reading travel blogs, flipping through national park books, and I follow several photographers on social media whom I have asked permission to use their photos as painting references.”

    You can purchase prints and original art via Kenney’s Etsy shop, find more merch on her Society6 store, and keep up to date with the artist’s latest creations by following her on Instagram.

    Texas-based artist Emily Kenney created a stunning landscape painting for every one of the 50 states in the U.S.

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    All paintings from the “50 States” series

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    New Mexico

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Arkansas

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Utah

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Georgia

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Vermont

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Tennessee

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Virginia

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Minnesota

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Delaware

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Iowa

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Mississippi

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    California

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Wyoming

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Kansas

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Kentucky

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Ohio

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    New Hampshire

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Pennsylvania

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Nevada

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    North Dakota

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Montana

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Hawaii

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Arizona

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Idaho

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    North Carolina

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Michigan

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    New York

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Rhode Island

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Florida

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Illinois

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Texas

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Nebraska

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Alaska

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Maryland

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Massachusetts

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Missouri

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    South Carolina

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Colorado

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Louisiana

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Maine

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Wisconsin

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    New Jersey

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    West Virginia

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Indiana

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Oklahoma

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Montana

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Alaska

    State Paintings by Emily Kenney

    Oregon

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    Connecticut

    State Landscape Painting by Emily Kenney

    South Dakota

    Emily Kenney: Etsy | Society6 | Instagram

    My Modern Met granted permission to feature photos by Emily Kenney.

    Related Articles:

    Artist Explores Her Lifelong Connection To Prairies Through Energetic Landscape Paintings

    Ethereal Landscape Paintings Evoke the Abstract Beauty of Morning Light in the Mountains

    Artist Fills Her Sketchbooks With Vibrant Landscape Paintings Inspired by Studio Ghibli Films

    Estate donation from late Sea Ranch couple helps preserve Sonoma County landscapes

    An revolutionary businessman with a booming giggle and existence as big as the redwoods, Pete Mattson devoted a great deal of his daily life to preserving Sonoma County’s open areas alongside his similarly devoted spouse Patty Mattson.

    A crew both of those in the foodstuff and beverage item improvement company Pete commenced, Mattson and Corporation, and in their philanthropic get the job done, Pete and Patty have left a long lasting impact as a result of the aged expansion and 2nd progress redwoods they served defend and in the open up spaces they served set apart from development.

    All those expanses involve the prized 5,630-acre Jenner Headlands Maintain open up to the public on the Sonoma Coast.

    “He had a huge voice, he was a tall big person, he had a substantial giggle and smile and explained what was on his brain,” Sam Hodder, President and CEO of Preserve the Redwoods League, reported of Pete. “And he thought in accomplishing big matters in his philanthropy.”

    In early 2021, Pete died at the age of 82, pursuing Patty, who died in 2016 at the age of 76. Together they still left $2 million evenly distributed to the Sonoma Land Trust and Save the Redwoods League, solidifying a legacy previously destined to endure.

    Their contribution was not about moi.

    “It truly was a real passion, not a vainness venture,” reported their son, Andy Mattson, of Hillsborough. “They truly experienced a extensive expression determination to preservation and it was genuinely sort of a lifelong point that seriously became more powerful and more robust as they went as a result of lifestyle.”

    Pete became a member of San Francisco-primarily based Conserve the Redwoods League in 2014, soon after serving on the league’s council for decades, mentioned Hodder.

    Hodder credited Pete with increasing the group’s mission by focusing on defense of land all around previous development redwoods, not just the groves themselves. Hodder known as him a “visionary.”

    Pete had a comparable affect above Sonoma Land Trust’s technique, in accordance to Eamon O’Byrne, the organization’s executive director.

    Pete bought included with Sonoma Land Have confidence in in the early 2000’s, Byrne said, and served as board chair from 2005 to 2009. In the course of his tenure Pete steered the firm by way of two enormous assignments — obtaining Sears Stage ranch overlooking San Pablo Bay and the $36 million Jenner Headlands residence, however the most expensive preservation deal in county historical past.

    Both tasks necessary a large fundraising hard work, built even more challenging by the recession hitting the country at the time, O’Byrne claimed.

    “Pete challenged us to consider additional systematically and assume much more strategically about what varieties of qualities we were going to get,” O’Byrne claimed. “What we ended up guarding them for and who we ended up protecting them for.”

    Those people working with Pete understood they’d also get the advantage of Patty’s support, as the pair have been a workforce in anything.

    “My father’s achievements with his organization and, to a certain extent in lifestyle, was mainly facilitated by my mother,” explained Andy.

    Hodder recalled Patty as a “wonderful and quite accomplished and remarkable lady.”

    The pair fulfilled when attending university at UC Berkeley and married in 1962.

    The $1 million the couple gave to the Help save the Redwoods League has gone specifically to the Harold Richardson Redwoods Reserve, which the group obtained in 2018, Hodder mentioned.

    Contacting the acquisition and the Mattson’s contribution “a seriously significant offer,” Hodder spelled out the group is scheduling to grant public obtain to the home northeast of Timber Cove, marking the initial new aged growth redwood park to open in a era.

    He explained the reserve as “a gem, — ”kind of a treasure, a ideal of what is still left acquisition.”

    There are a lot of factors that motivated Pete’s enjoy of the outdoors and fostered his passion for protecting it, explained his son Andy. Chief amid people explanations was Pete’s childhood in Los Angeles where populace was dense and trees had been scarce — there were just 5 in his neighborhood.

    “He normally considered (that) remaining in the previous expansion or second growth was analogous to currently being in a cathedral,” Andy reported.

    Pete’s regular enterprise outings also stoked his enthusiasm for the outdoors, Andy mentioned.

    As opposed to Pete, Patty was introduced to Northern California’s forests at a young age. Her spouse and children owned a forested ranch on Skaggs Springs Street among Lake Sonoma and Stewarts Position.

    Pete and Patty settled on the Peninsula, south of San Francisco, exactly where they raised their two children, Andy and daughter Marianne, now of Salem, Oregon. They invested much time traveling to national parks and family residing in The Sea Ranch — a location shut to the couple’s hearts and exactly where they finally turned home owners.

    “He was just a a single of a variety spirit and a California treasure like the redwoods he beloved,” Hodder explained.

    You can reach Workers Author Emma Murphy at 707-521-5228 or emma.murphy@pressdemocrat.com. On Twitter @MurphReports.

    Diverse landscapes – Garden Center Magazine

    illustration © Golden Sikorka | Adobe Stock

    Whether you’re delivering products to your customers or relying on deliveries and inventories of those goods, supply chain disruptions and skyrocketing costs are impacting every garden center business. Regardless of where they lay in the supply chain, disruptions are taking a heavy toll on independent retailers, many of which have few resources to absorb or push back on price increases, and even less leverage to pass those higher costs to customers.

    A whopping 44{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} of small businesses recently reported temporary shortages or other supply chain problems, according to a survey of approximately 800 companies by Vistage Worldwide Inc., a coaching and advisory organization for small businesses. Fortunately, even this far into the disruptions, planning, increased supply chain management, adding potential suppliers and increased technology can help every independent garden center retailer cope with, or even profit from, rising prices and the supply chain disarray.

    Coping with a volatile supply chain

    Garden centers develop supply chains so they can reduce their costs and remain competitive. An efficient, optimized supply chain is extremely important in the fulfillment of customer orders. However, it can also result in lower costs and a more efficient production or sales cycle when managed correctly.

    Supply chain management, or SCM, is the umbrella term that covers product development, sourcing, production, procurement, logistics and more. Without SCM, an independent garden center runs the risk of losing customers and its competitive edge.

    SCM isn’t just about creating an efficient process; it’s also crucial to mitigating risk and ensuring everything runs smoothly. After all, many elements make up the supply chain from manufacturing sites to warehouses to transportation, inventory management and order fulfillment. So it should come as no surprise that managing the supply chain, along with agile and efficient adoption of technologies, is creating a new way of operating.

    Without an optimized SCM process in place, the chain can fall apart from the very beginning. A dynamic approach to managing supply chains exists and provides everything a garden center needs to create a more robust supply chain. Apply agile strategies toward real-time disruptions, use powerful analytics that address and resolve root causes, and find management practices that pave the way for long-term growth.

    Flexibility vs. resilience

    When it comes to coping with disruptions and changes, flexibility and resilience are critical traits for success with a volatile supply chain. A resilient supply chain can weather the storm if one of its suppliers has to shut down production. And a flexible supply chain can adapt to market trends and conditions in the blink of an eye.

    With the rate of disruptions continuing and, in many cases, increasing, change management is required. It is important to focus specifically on dealing with disruptions and, if at all possible, avoiding them (via flexibility). This will be a largely operational hurdle involving establishing strategies for particular events or changes — often with the help of digital technology.

    Just in time

    While there is no single best way to create a winning supply chain strategy, a popular option among those with inventories is so-called “just-in-time” management for inventories of raw materials, supplies, goods and products. Just-in-time management cuts final producers’ costs while redistributing some of those costs to intermediate producers, who wind up either holding extra stock or finding other ways to cope with demand-side fluctuations.

    Unfortunately, the major problem of relying too heavily on just-in-time is glaringly evident in the industry credited with inventing it. Automakers have been crippled by a shortage of computer chips — vital car components produced mostly in Asia. Without enough chips on hand, automobile plants around the world have been forced to halt assembly lines.

    Still, today’s shortages raise the question of whether some garden center retailers have been too aggressively reaping savings by slashing inventory. Despite their role in the supply chain however, many key players say they don’t want to replace just-in-time entirely because the savings are too great.

    Alternate suppliers

    Many businesses have been using alternate suppliers to combat rising inflation, supply chain disruptions and labor shortages. Relying on backup suppliers to battle shortages or shipping delays is rapidly becoming the “new norm” for many garden centers.

    Shifting suppliers allows a business to “optimize costs.” An alternate supplier allows an IGC to quickly respond to supply chain disruptions, minimizing the impact on their bottom lines. Unfortunately, few are completely immune to supply chain disruption and are forced to hike prices if only to keep ahead of rising inflation.

    What’s more, maintaining multiple potential suppliers, however, requires planning — and a great amount of work. Of course, every business relying on numerous suppliers has a certain amount of flexibility when supply chain breakdowns occur. That has allowed them to better shield themselves from the impacts of COVID-19 outbreaks, extreme weather events and other supply chain disruptions.

    Spot bidding

    It’s no secret that supply shortages and disruptions have led to a record number of canceled contracts and the rise of “spot bidding.” When supply and capacity are strained, previously negotiated contracts and agreements are all-too-frequently thrown out the window, leaving little alternative to the incredibly inefficient spot bidding.

    Spot bidding requires many of the same, time-consuming, repetitive steps as the original process to reach out to potential carriers or suppliers, collect data and make new award declarations.

    Far too many within the industry failed to anticipate the sheer volume of canceled contracts or the rise of spot bidding, among other economic challenges. Complicating matters today, when an outsourcing need arises, many are turning to what is familiar and ignoring the impact of new problems with old, outdated processes and technology.

    Since it is often conducted outside of a formal sourcing process, spot bidding often introduces bias, where the business favors certain suppliers in the interest of speed, reducing the competitive tension that might have resulted in better offers.

    Understanding that in order to remain competitive and guard against disruptions, integrating new suppliers — and identifying which supply lines no longer hold value — is imperative. A garden center that overlooks emerging suppliers to preserve incumbent relationships does so at the expense of innovation and resiliency.

    According to many experts, a lack of a cohesive strategy and technology are the biggest hurdles to building future-ready supply chains. Fortunately, in an effort to upgrade these methods, many businesses are overhauling their old systems and attempting to streamline processes using optimization and automation technology for a more modernized supply chain.

    illustration © Golden Sikorka | Adobe Stock

    Optimization

    A fundamental way of achieving preparedness is to optimize processes wherever possible — especially in the procurement function. Optimization makes it possible to balance cost and speed objectives, give suppliers flexible bidding options and eliminate “lowest price wins” awards.

    With the right solution, the IGC retailer has the capability to handle everything from spot bids to large-scale RFPs, with a supplier-friendly interface that improves the operation’s direct materials, supplies or service award decisions. One such solution involves automation.

    Automation

    A computerized sourcing process can establish spot bidding and mini-tender events within minutes, managing and automating everything from inviting carriers and collecting bid data to generating award recommendations based on a set of criteria. A computerized system goes beyond cost savings by creating more efficiency.

    By reducing time-consuming, monotonous tasks, optimization and automation technology allows the garden center’s key personnel to do what they do best — focus on supplier relationships, accomplish broader goals for the operation and drive innovation.

    A problem without an answer

    With price hikes already common, inflation expectations are posing potential problems for some retailers. Pandemic buying and supply shortages exposed flaws in many supply chains that will continue to be exploited in the months ahead.

    Although many retailers learned how to cope with on-the-fly solutions (duct tape and chewing gum?), most postponed long-term investments while grappling with more immediate issues.

    Today, IGCs can utilize past lessons and move forward. For some, that will mean stockpiling more inventory and forging relationships with additional suppliers. Unfortunately, for far too many garden center owners and managers, the pursuit of cost savings will once again trump other considerations.

    Disruptions in the supply chain aren’t going away any time soon. The bottom line is that there is no single best way to create a winning supply chain strategy. However, by leveraging optimization and automation to create a future-ready supply chain, retailers can leave antiquated approaches behind and progress to modernity. The operation’s future may depend on it.

    The author is a business writer based in Pennsylvania. His tax and financial features have appeared in business magazines and trade journals for more than 25 years. Reach him at MEBatt12@Earthlink.net