Human fingerprint on structural density of forests globally
Watson, J. E. M. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600821 (2017).
Matricardi, E. A. T. et al. Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 369, 1378–1382 (2020).
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).
Grantham, H. S. et al. The emerging threat of extractives sector to intact forest landscapes. Front. For. Glob. Change https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.692338 (2021).
IPBES: Summary for Policymakers. In The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Díaz, S. et al.) (IPBES, 2019).
Qin, Y. et al. Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01026-5 (2021).
Maxwell, S. L. et al. Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax2546 (2019).
Betts, M. G. et al. Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).
Venter, O. et al. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001891 (2014).
Laurance, W. F. et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, 290–294 (2012).
Coad, L. et al. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the global database of protected area management effectiveness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140281 (2015).
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
Ehbrecht, M. et al. Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity. Nat. Commun. 12, 519 (2021).
Zhang, J., Nielsen, S. E., Mao, L., Chen, S. & Svenning, J. C. Regional and historical factors supplement current climate in shaping global forest canopy height. J. Ecol. 104, 469–478 (2016).
Ellis, E. C. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023483118 (2021).
Knight, C. A. et al. Land management explains major trends in forest structure and composition over the last millennium in California’s Klamath Mountains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116264119 (2022).
Stephens, L. et al. Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science 365, 897–902 (2019).
Asner, G. P., Llactayo, W., Tupayachi, R. & Luna, E. R. Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon revealed through high-resolution monitoring. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18454–18459 (2013).
Hoang, N. T. & Kanemoto, K. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 845–853 (2021).
Lim, C. L., Prescott, G. W., De Alban, J. D. T., Ziegler, A. D. & Webb, E. L. Untangling the proximate causes and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar. Conserv. Biol. 31, 1362–1372 (2017).
Sandel, B. & Svenning, J. C. Human impacts drive a global topographic signature in tree cover. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3474 (2013).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc. 13, 51 (2008).
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).
Yang, H. et al. A global assessment of the impact of individual protected areas on preventing forest loss. Sci. Total Environ. 777, 145995 (2021).
Jones, K. R. et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360, 788–791 (2018).
Clerici, N. et al. Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods. Sci. Rep. 10, 4971 (2020).
Heino, M. et al. Forest loss in protected areas and intact forest landscapes: a global analysis. PLoS ONE 10, e0138918 (2015).
Leberger, R., Rosa, I. M. D., Guerra, C. A., Wolf, F. & Pereira, H. M. Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108299 (2020).
Wade, C. M. et al. What is threatening forests in protected areas? A global assessment of deforestation in protected areas, 2001–2018. Forests 11, 539 (2020).
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN DESA, 2016).
Burleson, E. Paris Agreement and consensus to address climate challenge. ASIL Insight 20, 8 (2016).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Quegan, S. et al. The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: measuring forest above-ground biomass from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 227, 44–60 (2019).
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B. & Baccini, A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001708 (2011).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).
Atkins, J. W., Fahey, R. T., Hardiman, B. S. & Gough, C. M. Forest canopy structural complexity and light absorption relationships at the subcontinental scale. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 1387–1405 (2018).
Scarth, P., Armston, J., Lucas, R. & Bunting, P. A structural classification of Australian vegetation using ICESat/GLAS, ALOS PALSAR, and Landsat sensor data. Remote Sens. 11, 147 (2019).
Dubayah, R. et al. The global ecosystem dynamics investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).
Lang, N. et al. Global canopy height regression and uncertainty estimation from GEDI LIDAR waveforms with deep ensembles. Remote Sens. Environ. 268, 112760 (2022).
Marselis, S. M., Keil, P., Chase, J. M. & Dubayah, R. The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045003 (2022).
MacArthur, R. H. & MacArthur, J. W. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42, 594–598 (1961).
Walter, J. A., Stovall, A. E. L. & Atkins, J. W. Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecosphere 12, e03390 (2021).
Camps-Valls, G. et al. A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc7447 (2021).
Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch-Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. Managing the middle: a shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 811–826 (2019).
Weiss, D. J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).
Chazdon, R. L. et al. A policy‐driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. 10, 125–132 (2017).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).
Schneider, F. D. et al. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nat. Commun. 8, 1441 (2017).
Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).
Ponta, N. et al. Drivers of transgression: what pushes people to enter protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109121 (2021).
Pack, S. M. et al. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in the Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 197, 32–39 (2016).
Tollefson, J. Illegal mining in the Amazon hits record high amid Indigenous protests. Nature 598, 15–16 (2021).
Thies, C., Rosoman, G., Cotter, J. & Meaden, S. Intact Forest Landscapes. Why It Is Crucial to Protect Them from Industrial Exploitation Technical Note Bd 5 (Greenpeace, 2011).
Chazdon, R. L. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320, 1458–1460 (2008).
Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conserv. Lett. 7, 61–69 (2014).
Dave, R. et al. Second Bonn Challenge Progress Report: Application of the Barometer in 2018 (IUCN, 2018).
Tang, H. & Armston, J. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for GEDI L2B Footprint Canopy Cover and Vertical Profile Metrics (Goddard Space Flight Center, 2019).
Adam, M., Urbazaev, M., Dubois, C. & Schmullius, C. Accuracy assessment of GEDI terrain elevation and canopy height estimates in European temperate forests: influence of environmental and acquisition parameters. Remote Sens. 12, 3948 (2020).
Dorado-Roda, I. et al. Assessing the accuracy of GEDI data for canopy height and aboveground biomass estimates in Mediterranean forests. Remote Sens. 13, 2279 (2021).
Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112845 (2022).
Hofton, M., Blair, J. B., Story, S. & Yi, D. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) (NASA, 2020).
Dubayah, R. et al. GEDI L3 Gridded Land Surface Metrics v.2 (ORNL DAAC, 2021).
Roy, D. P., Kashongwe, H. B. & Armston, J. The impact of geolocation uncertainty on GEDI tropical forest canopy height estimation and change monitoring. Sci. Remote Sens. 4, 100024 (2021).
Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Loveland, T. R. & Pittman, K. Combining MODIS and Landsat imagery to estimate and map boreal forest cover loss. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3708–3719 (2008).
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).
Silva, C. A. et al. rGEDI: NASA’s global ecosystem ynamics investigation (GEDI) data visualization and processing. R package version 0.1.2. (2020).
The R Project for Statistical Computing (The R Foundation, 2014); https://www.R-project.org/
Fischer, B., Smith, M., Pau, G., Morgan, M. & van Twisk, D. rhdf5: R interface to HDF5. R package version 2.40.0 (2022).
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).
Giglio, L., Loboda, T., Roy, D. P., Quayle, B. & Justice, C. O. An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 408–420 (2009).
Hengl, T. & Wheeler, I. Soil organic carbon content in x 5 g/kg at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475458 (2018).
Farr, T. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183 (2007).
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning Vol. 112 (Springer, 2013).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Bivand, R. et al. Package ‘spdep’: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics version 1.2-7 (The Comprehensive R Archive Network, 2015).
Bivand, R., Yu, D., Nakaya, T., Garcia-Lopez, M.-A. & Bivand, M. R. Package ‘spgwr’: geographically eighted regression. R package version 0.6-35 (2020).
Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C. & Charlton, M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships (Wiley, 2003).