Community-driven tree planting greens the neighbouring landscape

  • 1.

    Le, Q. B., Nkonya, E. & Mirzabaev, A. Biomass productivity-based mapping of global land degradation hotspots. Econ. Land Degrad. Improve. Glob. Assess. Sustain. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_4 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    IPBES. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Secrateriat Intergov. Sci. Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3237393 (2018).

  • 3.

    Webb, N. P. et al. Land degradation and climate change: Building climate resilience in agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 450–259 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L. & Bustamante, M. Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 6, 8–14 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Waswa, B. S. et al. Geoderma Evaluating indicators of land degradation in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Geoderma 195–196, 192–200 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Lasco, R. D., Delfino, R. J. P., Catacutan, D. C., Simelton, E. S. & Wilson, D. M. Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers : The roles of trees and agroforestry. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 6, 83–88 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Thorlakson, T., Neufeldt, H. Reducing subsistence farmers’ vulnerability to climate change: evaluating the potential contributions of agroforestry in western Kenya. Agric & Food Secur. 1, 15 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    De Giusti, G., Kristjanson, P. & Rufino, M.C. Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation practice in smallholder farming: evidence from Kenya. Climatic Change 153, 379–394 (2019).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C. & Sileshi, G. W. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub- Saharan Africa. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 13, 40–54 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Henry, M. et al. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agric. Ecosyt. Environ. 129, 238–252 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Jindal, R., Swallow, B. & Kerr, J. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa : Potential benefits and challenges. Nat. Resour. Forum 32, 116–130 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Estrada, M. & Corbera, E. The potential of carbon offsetting projects in the forestry sector for poverty reduction in developing countries. in Integrating Ecology and Poverty Reduction: The Application of Ecology in Development Solutions (eds. Ingram, J. C., DeClerck, F. & del Rio, C.) 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0186-5_11 (Springer, 2011).

  • 13.

    Willemen, L. et al. How to halt the global decline of lands. Nat. Sustain. 3, 164–166 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Reed, M. S. Participatory technology development for agroforestry extension: An innovation-decision approach. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2, 334–341 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Shames, S., Wollenberg, E., Buck, L. E., Kristjanson, P. & Masiga, M. Institutional Innovations in African Smallholder Carbon Projects. CCAFS Report No. 8 Copenhagen, Denmark: CCAFS (2012).

  • 16.

    TIST. TIST Program Summary: Kenya. http://www.tist.org/tist/docs/USAID-Documents/TIST{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Program{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Summary{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20KE{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20200101.pdf (2021).

  • 17.

    I4EI. USAID Kenya TIST Program Final Performance Report. http://www.tist.org/tist/docs/USAID-Documents/I4EI{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20USAID{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20KE{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20140616{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Final{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Report{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20140619.pdf (2014).

  • 18.

    Oppenheimer, S. Impact Evaluation of the TIST Program in Kenya. 1–38. http://www.tist.org/tist/docs/PDD-Documents/TIST{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20KE{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20PD-VCS-Ex23{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20GL2{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Community{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Survey{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Result.pdf (2011).

  • 19.

    CAAC. Monitoring Report For TIST Program in Kenya. VCS-009, Verification 03. http://www.tist.org/tist/docs/PDD-Documents/TIST{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20KE{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20PD-VCS-009n{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20App13{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Verif{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}2003{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Monitoring{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20Rpt{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48}20200522-2.pdf (2020).

  • 20.

    Jose, S. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor. Syst. 76, 1–10 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Mafongoya, P. et al. Maize productivity and pro fi tability in Conservation Agriculture systems across agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe : A review of knowledge and practice. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 220, 211–225 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Wang, J. et al. Relations between NDVI and tree productivity in the central Great Plains. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25, 3127–3138 (2004).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Gichenje, H. & Godinho, S. Establishing a land degradation neutrality national baseline through trend analysis of GIMMS NDVI time-series. Land Degrad. Dev. 29, 2985–2997 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Fensholt, R. & Proud, S. R. Evaluation of earth observation based global long term vegetation trends—Comparing GIMMS and MODIS global NDVI time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 119, 131–147 (2012).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Borish, D., King, N. & Dewey, C. Enhanced community capital from primary school feeding and agroforestry program in Kenya. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 52, 10–18 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    De Jong, B. H. J., Bazán, E. E. & Montalvo, S. Application of the “Climafor” baseline to determine leakage : The case of Scolel Te. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 12, 1153–1168 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Ilstedt, U. et al. Intermediate tree cover can maximize groundwater recharge in the seasonally dry tropics. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Ndayambaje, J. D. & Mohren, G. M. J. Fuelwood demand and supply in Rwanda and the role of agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 83, 303–320 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Iiyama, M. et al. The potential of agroforestry in the provision of sustainable woodfuel in sub-Saharan Africa. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 6, 138–147 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    TIST. The Tree: TIST Uganda December 2011 Newsletter. (2011). https://program.tist.org/uganda-newsletters. Accessed 5 Feb 2021.

  • 31.

    TIST. Mazingira Bora: TIST Kenya January 2012 Newsletter. (2012). https://program.tist.org/kenya-newsletters. Accessed 5 Feb 2021.

  • 32.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Multiple afforestation programs accelerate the greenness in the ‘Three North’ region of China from 1982 to 2013. Ecol. Indic. 61, 404–412 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Holl, B. N. & Brancalion, P. H. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science (80) 368, 580–582 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Lenton, T. M. Tipping positive change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 1–2 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Eckert, S., Kiteme, B., Njuguna, E. & Zaehringer, J. G. Agricultural expansion and intensification in the foothills of Mount Kenya : A landscape perspective. Remote Sens. 9, 784 (2017).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Schmocker, J., Liniger, H. P., Ngeru, J. N., Brugnara, Y. & Auchmann, R. Trends in mean and extreme precipitation in the Mount Kenya region from observations and reanalyses. Int. J. Climatol. 1514, 1500–1514 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    FAO. Africover Multipurpose Land Cover Database for Kenya. (2000). https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/agricultural-areas-in-kenya. Accessed 4 June 2020.

  • 38.

    Williams, D. L., Goward, S. & Arvidson, T. Landsat: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 72, 1171–1178 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Holben, B. N. Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 7, 1417–1434 (1986).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Gorelick, N. et al. Remote sensing of environment google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    QGIS.org. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. Version 3.8.2. http://www.qgis.org (2021).

  • 42.

    R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Version 3.6.3. https://www.R-project.org (2021).

  • Review of forest and landscape restoration in Africa 2021 – World

    New overview finds slow development in restoring Africa’s degraded lands, urges bigger initiatives for climate action

    With the UN 10 years on Ecosystem Restoration underway, evaluate finds successes and numerous challenges ahead to restore Africa’s degraded lands and boost livelihoods

    29 September 2021, Accra – The initial at any time stocktake of restoring Africa’s forests and landscapes, launched today through Africa Weather Week, displays that a lot more requires to be carried out to fully tap the tremendous opportunity for the continent to return land to sustainable production, protect biodiversity, and defend livelihoods in the struggle towards local climate change.

    Up to 65 p.c of effective land is degraded, while desertification influences 45 p.c of Africa’s land region. While the general craze is shifting downward, net reduction of forests is continue to expanding in Africa with 4 million hectares of forest disappearing each 12 months. Africa’s drylands are quite vulnerable to local climate alter and their restoration is a priority for adaptation and making resilient and sustainable meals techniques.

    The Evaluate of Forest and Landscape Restoration in Africa 2021 is a joint investigation carried out by the Meals and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the African Union Improvement Agency-NEPAD and presents the successes so much and the remaining difficulties and opportunities across the continent in restoring land degraded by conversion and forest clearance, overuse of normal sources, urbanization, drought, and other components.

    “Despite our initiatives, each individual 12 months much more forest disappears, costing the continent a 3 p.c loss of GDP,” explained Abebe Haile-Gabriel, FAO Assistant Director-Standard and Regional Representative for Africa in the *Review’s *Foreword. “Degraded forest landscapes intensify the consequences of climate transform and are a barrier to developing resilient and affluent communities when 60 p.c of Africans depend on their land and their forests.”

    “The urgent have to have to reverse these adverse and devastating traits has prompted African leaders to dedicate to the restoration of the continent’s ecosystems. Via its roadmap for improvement, Agenda 2063, the African continent commits to ecosystems restoration by preserving, restoring and advertising and marketing sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably controlling forests, and combating desertification,” reported Dr Ibrahim Assane Mayaki, Main Government Officer, African Union Enhancement Company-NEPAD, in his Foreword. “This evaluate of current approaches and exploration of rising chances is critical to accelerating restoration efforts.”

    Area engagement is vital to results

    Most of the initiatives assessed in the *Evaluation *have a strong local weather change dimension, aiming at not only sequestering carbon, but also generating jobs, decreasing the vulnerabilities of rural people to meals insecurity and aiding them adapt to weather adjustments.

    The Review identifies neighborhood ownership and stakeholder engagement as essential elements for good results. Significant-amount political guidance and obtain to finance are also vital.

    Challenges with longer-term finance, land tenure and property legal rights are key problems along with insecurity and conflict, deficiency of technical capacity and restricted entry because of to lousy infrastructure.

    “Extending effectively outside of tree-planting, forest and landscape restoration is an all-encompassing approach to returning trees and forests to landscapes where they have been misplaced and is of fantastic gain to sustainable food manufacturing, building resilience and disaster danger reduction,” mentioned Nora Berrahmouni, Senior Forestry Officer, FAO Regional Office for Africa and 1 of the *Review’s *direct authors. “African international locations and their partners will need to go on to scale-up their endeavours in forest and landscape restoration as a viable alternative to local climate alter and developing ahead superior in reaction to COVID-19, although also safeguarding their normal funds. It’s a extensive-term approach but it is a sustainable, ahead-seeking alternative.”

    The Assessment is an crucial baseline to evaluate urgently-needed progress all through the UN 10 years of Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030.

    Reality BOX

    Africa has 1 billion hectares of drylands and 393 million hectares of these have to have restoration in Africa’s Excellent Inexperienced Wall locations, which include 33 million hectares that are restorable in Northern Africa, 162 million ha in the Sahara-Sahel nations around the world and 198 million ha in the Kalahari-Namib countries.

    AFR100 fully commited 31 African governments to bringing 100 million hectares underneath restoration by 2030 – a obstacle presently exceeded. As of June 2021, 129 912 800 hectares have been pledged for restoration less than AFR100.

    Africa has an approximated further 132 million hectares of degraded cropland – mixed with local weather change this increases the vulnerability of thousands and thousands of individuals.

    About 45 per cent of Africa’s land is impacted by desertification – 55 p.c of this is at incredibly high chance of even further desertification.

    In just Africa, the FAO-led Motion In opposition to Desertification programme in aid of the Great Eco-friendly Wall, will work with regional communities, governments and civil society to restore degraded land in quite a few nations: Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Sudan. Between 2015 and 2020, 63 000 hectares of degraded lands ended up planted to initiate their restoration and enriched with over 12 million seedlings and 120 tonnes of forest seeds from about 100 indigenous species of trees and fodder grasses. The programme was originally supported by the European Union and has been additional expanded with contributions from Turkey and other donors.

    The expense of restoration may differ extensively. The assessment discovered that in Madagascar, charges are estimated at USD 680 for every hectare, while in Ethiopia it is estimated at USD 87 – 1 445.

    Contacts

    FAO

    Zoie Jones
    Regional Communications Officer
    Zoie.Jones@FAO.org
    African Union Progress Agency-NEPAD

    Teko Nhlapho
    Communication & Advocacy Officer
    TekoH@nepad.org

    Sources and hyperlinks

    Down load the publication in English and French.

    AUDA-NEPAD

    AFR100

    Motion Against Desertification

    Africa: New FAO Report Highlights Urgent Need to Restore Africa’s Degraded Landscape

    The initially-ever stocktake of Africa’s forests and landscapes, which was introduced on Wednesday finds gradual progress in repairing Africa’s degraded lands and urges ramped up endeavours for local climate action.

    NEW YORK, United states, September 29, 2021,-/African Media Agency (AMA)/-Launched through Africa Local climate 7 days, and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, the Overview of Forest and Landscape Restoration in Africa 2021, exhibits, that extra desires to be finished to tap the continent’s possibility to return land to sustainable output, guard biodiversity, and defend livelihoods in the struggle against weather modify.

    “Irrespective of our attempts, each and every 12 months far more forest disappears, costing the continent a a few per cent reduction of GDP”, claimed Abebe Haile-Gabriel, Foodstuff and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) Assistant Director-Common and Regional Representative for Africa.

    The analysis has been printed by FAO together with the African Union Progress Agency-NEPAD.

    A grim evaluation

    Up to 65 for each cent of productive land is degraded, when desertification influences 45 for every cent of Africa’s land area, according to the critique.

    And whilst the total development is moving downward, web loss of forests is even now rising in Africa, with 4 million hectares of forest disappearing every yr.

    Furthermore, Africa’s drylands are more and more a lot more susceptible to local climate adjust and their restoration is a precedence for adaptation and constructing resilient and sustainable food devices.

    “Degraded forest landscapes intensify the outcomes of climate improve and are a barrier to creating resilient and prosperous communities when 60 p.c of Africans rely on their land and their forests”, mentioned the FAO formal.

    Nearby engagement is vital

    Most of the tasks assessed in the Evaluate have a potent local climate transform dimension that not only aims to sequester carbon but also to build work opportunities and reduce the vulnerabilities of rural people today to food stuff insecurity.

    A quick look

    Africa has one particular billion hectares of drylands, 393 million hectares of which want restoration in Africa’s Great Eco-friendly Wall locations.

    AFR100 has committed 31 African Governments to restoring 100 million hectares by 2030 – a problem currently exceeded.

    Africa has an approximated additional 132 million hectares of degraded cropland, which mixed with climate alter, can make tens of millions additional vulnerable.