Cumulative effects of human footprint, natural features and predation risk best predict seasonal resource selection by white-tailed deer

  • Eisner, R., Seabrook, L. M. & McAlpine, C. A. Are changes in global oil production influencing the rate of deforestation and biodiversity loss?. Biol. Conserv. 196, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.017 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/132419 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfeifer, M. et al. Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24457 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tilman, D., May, R., Lehman, C. & Nowak, M. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/371065a0 (1994).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Burton, C. A. Wildlife winners and losers in an oil sands landscape. Front Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1807 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heim, N., Fisher, J. T., Volpe, J., Clevenger, A. P. & Paczkowski, J. Carnivore community response to anthropogenic landscape change: species-specificity foils generalizations. Landscape Ecol. 34, 2493–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00882-z (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. & Martins, I. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northrup, J. M., Anderson, C. R. Jr. & Wittemyer, G. Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer. Glob Change Biol. 21, 3961–3970. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13037 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holbrook, S. J. & Schmitt, R. J. The combined effects of predation risk and food reward on patch selection. Ecology 69, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943167 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moody, A. L., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. Ideal free distributions under predation risk. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 131–143 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dietz, H. & Edwards, P. J. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87, 1359–1367 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hobbs, R. J. & Huenneke, L. F. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6, 324–337 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van der Graaf, S., Stahl, J., Klimkowska, A. & Drent, J. P. B. Surfing on a green wave—How plant growth drives spring migration in the Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis. Ardea -Wageningen- 94, 567 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Parker, I. M. et al. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010034312781 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shackelford, N. et al. Primed for change: developing ecological restoration for the 21st Century. Restor. Ecol. 21, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12012 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pickell, P. D., Pickell, P. D., Andison, D. W., Coops, N. C. & Gergel, S. E. The spatial patterns of anthropogenic disturbance in the western Canadian boreal forest following oil and gas development. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0546 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Wilkinson, L. The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mammal Rev. 35, 51–81 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wittische, J., Heckbert, S., James, P. M. A., Burton, A. C. & Fisher, J. T. Community-level modelling of boreal forest mammal distribution in an oil sands landscape. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 142500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142500 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hewitt, D. G. Biology and management of white-tailed deer (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCabe, R. E. & McCabe, T. R. in White tailed deer: ecology and management Ch. Chapter 2, 19–72 (Stackpole, A Wildlife Management Institute Book, 1984).

  • Webb, R. The range of white-tailed deer in Alberta (Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division Edmonton, Alberta, 1967).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawe, K. L. & Boutin, S. Climate change is the primary driver of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) range expansion at the northern extent of its range; land use is secondary. Ecol. Evol. 6, 6435–6451. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2316 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeCesare, N. J., Hebblewhite, M., Robinson, H. S. & Musiani, M. Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation. Anim. Conserv. 13, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00328.x (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A. D. M., Latham, M. C., McCutchen, N. A. & Boutin, S. Invading white-tailed deer change wolf-caribou dynamics in northeastern Alberta. J. Wildl. Manag. 75, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.28 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A. D. M., Latham, M. C., Boyce, M. C. & Boutin, S. Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Ecol. Appl. 21, 11 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T., Burton, A. C., Nolan, L. & Roy, L. Influences of landscape change and winter severity on invasive ungulate persistence in the Nearctic boreal forest. Sci. Rep. 10, 8742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65385-3 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dabros, A., Pyper, M. & Castilla, G. Seismic lines in the boreal and arctic ecosystems of North America: environmental impacts, challenges, and opportunities. Environ. Rev. 26, 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2017-0080 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dickie, M., Serrouya, R., McNay, R. S., Boutin, S. & du Toit, J. Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features and implications for hunting behaviour. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12732 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finnegan, L., MacNearney, D. & Pigeon, K. E. Divergent patterns of understory forage growth after seismic line exploration: implications for caribou habitat restoration. For. Ecol. Manag. 409, 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.010 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prokopenko, C. M., Boyce, M. S., Avgar, T. & Tulloch, A. Characterizing wildlife behavioural responses to roads using integrated step selection analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12768 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waring, G. H., Griffis, J. L. & Vaughn, M. E. White-tailed deer roadside behavior, wildlife warning reflectors, and highway mortality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 29, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90249-W (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bowman, J., Ray, J. C., Magoun, A. J., Johnson, D. S. & Dawson, F. N. Roads, logging, and the large-mammal community of an eastern Canadian boreal forest. Can. J. Zool. 88, 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1139/z10-019 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munro, K. G., Bowman, J. & Fahrig, L. Effect of paved road density on abundance of white-tailed deer. Wildl. Res. 39, 478. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr11152 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Burton, A. C. Spatial structure of reproductive success infers mechanisms of ungulate invasion in Nearctic boreal landscapes. Ecol. Evol. 11, 900–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7103 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kie, J. G. Optimal foraging and risk of predation effects on behavior and social structure in ungulates. J. Mammal. 80, 1114–1129 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, J. S., Laundré, J. W. & Gurung, M. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal. 80, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383287 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittle, A. M., Fryxell, J. M., Desy, G. E. & Hamr, J. The scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates. Oecologia 157, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1051-9 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moen, A. N. Energy conservation by white-tailed deer in the winter. Ecology 57, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936411 (1976).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt, K. Winter ecology of nonmigratory Alpine red deer. Oecologia 95, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323494 (1993).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kilgo, J. C., Ray, H. S., Vukovich, M., Goode, M. J. & Ruth, C. Predation by coyotes on white-tailed deer neonates in South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.393 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laurent, M., Dickie, M., Becker, M., Serrouya, R. & Boutin, S. Evaluating the mechanisms of landscape change on white-tailed deer populations. J. Wildl. Manag. 85, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21979 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider, R. R., Hauer, G., Adamowicz, W. L. & Boutin, S. Triage for conserving populations of threatened species: the case of woodland caribou in Alberta. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.002 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kilkenny, C., Browne Wj Fau – Cuthill, I. C., Cuthill Ic Fau – Emerson, M., Emerson M Fau – Altman, D. G. & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS biol. 8(6), e1000412 (2010).

  • DelGiudice, G. D., Mangipane, B. A., Sampson, B. A. & Kochanny, C. O. Chemical immobilization, body temperature, and post-release mortality of white-tailed deer captured by clover trap and net-gun. Wildl. Soc. Bull. (1973-2006) 29, 1147–1157 (2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Droge, E., Creel, S., Becker, M. S. & M’Soka, J. Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0220-9 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunkel, K. E. & Mech, L. D. Wolf and bear predation on white-tailed deer fawns in northeastern Minnesota. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1557–1565 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A., Latham, M., Knopff, K., Hebblewhite, M. & Boutin, S. Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: Implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00035.x (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. Alberta Vegetation Index. Accessed October 2016. https://geodiscover.alberta.ca/

  • Manly, B., McDonald, L., Thomas, D., McDonald, T. & Erickson, W.Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Vol. 63, pp. 1-10 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).

  • Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E. & Schmiegelow, F. K. A. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 157, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hijmans, R. & van Etten, J. Raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. CRAN R package 2 (2016).

  • R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Vienna, Austria, 2013).

  • Zuur, A., Hilbe, J. & Ieno, E. A Beginner’s Guide to GLM and GLMM with R: a frequentist and Bayesian perspective for ecologists. (Highland Statistics, 2013).

  • Gillies, C. S. et al. Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01106.x (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Craney, T. A. & Surles, J. G. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual. Eng. 14, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Selected papers of hirotugu akaike 199–213 (Springer, New York, 1998).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 (2004).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boulanger, Y. et al. Climate change impacts on forest landscapes along the Canadian southern boreal forest transition zone. Landscape Ecol. 32, 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0421-7 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sulla-Menashe, D., Woodcock, C. E. & Friedl, M. A. Canadian boreal forest greening and browning trends: an analysis of biogeographic patterns and the relative roles of disturbance versus climate drivers. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9b88 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • St-Pierre, F., Drapeau, P. & St-Laurent, M.-H. Drivers of vegetation regrowth on logging roads in the boreal forest: Implications for restoration of woodland caribou habitat. For. Ecol. Manag. 482, 118846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118846 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berger, J. Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biol. Let. 3, 620–623. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0415 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heyes, A., Leach, A. & Mason, C. F. The economics of Canadian oil sands. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 12, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey006 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Komers, P. E. & Stanojevic, Z. Rates of disturbance vary by data resolution: implications for conservation schedules using the Alberta boreal forest as a case study. Global Change Biol. 19, 2916–2928 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hebblewhite, M. & Merrill, E. H. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90, 3445–3454. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2090.1 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mech, D. L. & Boitani, L. Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation Vol. 57 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Creel, S., Winnie, J. A., Christianson, D. & Liley, S. Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk. Anim. Behav. 76, 1139–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steenweg, R. et al. Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet’s biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1448 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hebblewhite, M. Billion dollar boreal woodland caribou and the biodiversity impacts of the global oil and gas industry. Biol. Cons. 206, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.014 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C. & Waller, D. M. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 113–147 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCullough, D. R. Evaluation of night spotlighting as a deer study technique. J. Wildl. Manag. 46, 963–973. https://doi.org/10.2307/3808229 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preston, T., Wildhaber, M., Green, N., Albers, J. & Debenedetto, G. Enumerating white-tailed deer using unmanned aerial vehicles. Wildlife Soc. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1149 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parks, A. E. Provincial woodland caribou range plan. 212 (Edmonton, Alberta, 2017).

  • Tattersall, E. R., Burgar, J. M., Fisher, J. T. & Burton, A. C. Boreal predator co-occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1678–1691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6028 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (New York N.Y.) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bayoumi, T. & Muhleisen, M. Energy, the exchange rate, and the economy: macroeconomic benefits of Canada’s oil sands production (International Monetary Fund, Washington, 2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu, K., Song, Y. & Qin, C. Forest age improves understanding of the global carbon sink. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 3962. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900797116 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • How Can Arts Organizations Reduce Their Carbon Footprint? Here Are 6 Takeaways From a New Art-World Climate Conference

    Is the art world going to save the warming planet? Yes, according to novelist and poet Ben Okri, for art deals with vision, which is needed to paint the picture of a sustainable future amid the urgent calls for change. “Don’t talk yourselves down,” he told the art-world audience members at the Gallery Climate Coalition (GCC) conference “Decarbonising the Art World” at London’s Barbican Centre on November 24.

    Okri’s words were not empty. The GCC, a confederation of some 600 dealers, has set the ambitious goals of reducing the art world’s carbon emissions by 50 percent (from 2018 and 2019 levels) and achieving zero-waste operations by 2030. The conference marked the official launch of the detailed, 43-page Decarbonisation Action Plan, which offers concrete tips and a step-by-step guide to help its members (consisting primarily of art galleries and artists in Europe and the Americas) to transform pledges into action. 

    The goal is aligned with those set out by the Paris Agreement, and the conference at the Barbican Centre was intended as a follow-up to the recently concluded United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, which lacked discussion of culture on the agenda, said Lucia Pietroiusti, a curator and strategic consultant for ecology at the Serpentine Galleries.

    An Oxfam demonstration outside Glasgow’s Gallery of Modern Art on November 1, 2021. Photo: Chris Jackson/Getty Images.

    “Compared to five years ago, there’s so much more activism and people are more outspoken,” Danny Chivers, an environmental researcher and advisor who played a key role in drafting the GCC’s Decarbonisation Action Plan, said at the conference. “If you talked about 50 percent [reduction in carbon emissions], people would be like, ‘Oh God!’ but now, people would say, ‘Let’s have that conversation.’ We are in a different space.”

    Experts and some art-world leaders believe the goal is achievable—particularly those who have already taken action, following the coalition’s guidelines and plan.

    Here are six simple steps proposed by GCC’s Decarbonisation Action Plan for the art world to kickstart reducing carbon emissions:

    1. Appoint a ‘Green Team’

    The GCC encourages art organizations are encouraged to form an internal group dedicated to making changes to reduce environmental impact. The team should be in charge of setting and reviewing targets, organizing meetings, and drafting a timeline for the organization to implement the action plan.

    2. Do a Carbon Audit

    “It’s like a tax return,” the London-based dealer Kate MacGarry said at the conference. Reduction goals cannot be set without calculating the baseline emissions in the first place, according to experts. The GCC has developed an online carbon calculator for its members, who are encouraged to do the carbon audit annually.

    3. Analyze Data and Make Changes

    In MacGarry’s case, emissions from business travels and art transport accounted for nearly 45 percent of the gallery’s total carbon emissions between 2018 and 2019. This year, the dealer decided to go to Art Basel by train. She has also given up bubble wrap and plastic for art packaging.

    4. Set Targets for 2025 and 2030

    The GCC action plan suggests art organizations divide their reduction goal into several stages. Those aiming to reduce carbon emissions by 50 percent in 2030 can start with a 25-to-30 percent reduction from the baseline by 2025. Those who are aiming for a 70 percent reduction by 2030 can set themselves a higher bar, at a 30-to-40 percent reduction by 2025.

    5. Setting a Year-on-Year Milestone 

    As a follow-up to step four, art organizations can look at their year-on-year annual carbon dioxide allocation, which should show a gradual reduction in carbon emissions every year. It’s almost like setting a financial goal and creating an annual financial budgeting that allows one to achieve this goal within a period of time, says the action plan.

    For instance, a 30 percent reduction of carbon emissions by 2025 will require an average of five percent cut per year from 2019 to 2025. Then an art organization can look into the various areas of its operation, from travels to energy consumption and shipping, and decide what actions to take in order to achieve the reduction goal.

    6. Action Time

    Once you have done your carbon audit and set your goals, now it’s time to take action. The GCC has come up with a list of 50 effective actions to give art organizations ideas for changes to make, from smaller, manageable tasks to ambitious jobs that may require a little more research and planning. These actions are divided into six categories: shipping, travel, energy, packaging and materials, waste and recycling, as well as exhibitions and gallery spaces.

    Regarding shipping, for example, the GCC asks its members to prioritize land and sea freight over air. (“Collectors need to be understanding as well, and not hurry the works,” said MacGarry.) The coalition also asks members to reconsider non-essential travel and avoid flying—whenever possible, taking a train rather than a plane. It also recommends hiring local teams to install international exhibitions remotely and avoiding single-use plastics in packaging.

    This article was updated on November 26.

    Follow Artnet News on Facebook:


    Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.