BC’s changing regulatory landscape: BC and Treaty 8 First Nations negotiate collaborative approach to address cumulative effects of resource development | Canada | Global law firm

BC’s changing regulatory landscape: BC and Treaty 8 First Nations negotiate collaborative approach to address cumulative effects of resource development | Canada | Global law firm

British Columbia has declared that, following 2021’s Yahey v British Columbia1 decision, it has reached agreements with five Treaty 8 Initial Nations over the province’s administration of purely natural sources. The agreements, which have not but been introduced, signal sizeable alterations to how future resource advancement will arise in the province in each the in close proximity to time period and in the decades ahead.

The important qualifications – 2021 British Columbia Supreme Courtroom conclusion

The agreements are the result of negotiations arising from the 2021 British Columbia Supreme Courtroom conclusion in which Blueberry River Initial Country productively sued British Columbia, a determination the province chose not to appeal. 

In that decision, the courtroom was hugely important of several elements of the province’s regulatory routine and concluded that cumulative results from industrial improvement experienced seriously undermined Blueberry River’s treaty legal rights, leaving them with no significant capacity to workout their Treaty 8 legal rights in their regular territory. Specially, the courtroom observed the province’s regulatory processes did not sufficiently take into consideration, or talk to on, cumulative impacts, nor ended up there meaningful enforcement mechanisms to restrict improvement to shield Blueberry River’s treaty rights from those people impacts. The court purchased British Columbia and Blueberry River to act with diligence to negotiate on a collaborative approach to useful resource administration that addresses cumulative results. 

The agreements introduced are the end result of these negotiations as nicely as additional negotiations with four other Treaty 8 Initially Nations: Fort Nelson, Saulteau, Halfway River and Doig River To start with Nations. The province has mentioned conversations are ongoing with 3 other Treaty 8 First Nations: West Moberly Initial Country, Prophet River 1st Country, and the McLeod Lake Indian Band.

Whilst far more information are to be announced in excess of the coming months, the agreements’ standard outlines have now been created community. 

Blueberry River Initial Nations Implementation Settlement2

On January 18, 2023, British Columbia announced the Blueberry River To start with Nations Implementation Agreement (Implementation Agreement) that consists of both of those a financial part for remediation and reclamation activities as very well as a framework for taking care of resources going ahead.

Significantly, the Implementation Agreement commits to:

  • shorter term limits on development in Treaty 8 lands when a regime for the extensive-phrase administration of cumulative results is implemented
  • caps on new land disturbances in just the Blueberry River’s territory (to a most of 750 hectares on a yearly basis)developing an “ecosystem management approach” to land use scheduling and forestry
  • employing “land protections” (such as previous forest advancement protection) covering a lot more than 650,000 hectares in Blueberry River’s substantial-value places
  • finishing a number of watershed-level land use plans in the next 3 many years
  • co-administration of wildlife, which includes moose management in distinct and
  • letting a established of large-benefit programs concentrated on petroleum and organic gasoline (PNG) sector activities to be finished in 15 months. 

For PNG especially, the Implementation Settlement also anticipates collaboration involving the province, businesses, Blueberry River and other nations for enhancement strategies with actions to incorporate:

  • establishing locations for long term defense from new advancement
  • focusing disturbance from PNG where ever possible in areas presently developed
  • cutting down new disturbance from PNG by roughly 50{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} from pre-court choice several years
  • introducing operational and strategic arranging anticipations for the sector, relevant to all new proposed actions and
  • restricting all round new disturbance from PNG things to do in Blueberry River’s declare region, specified at 750 hectares, as additional in depth planning and restoration pursuits can be produced and agreed to.3 

The Implementation Settlement also provides an $87.5 million money bundle to Blueberry River and a $200 million land restoration fund, as properly as contemplating oil and gas royalty earnings sharing with Blueberry River.

Even though the Implementation Settlement is not nevertheless community, the Oil and Gas Fee of British Columbia has currently issued a specific summary of its implications for PNG improvement. 

Consensus Doc

On January 20, 2023, British Columbia announced it had attained consensus with four other Treaty 8 Initially Nations “on a collaborative method to land and source organizing, and to progress regional options to reward all people residing in northeastern B.C. and Treaty 8 territory.”4 This co-designed established of initiatives, termed the “Consensus Document,” equally commit the province to employ measures to tackle the cumulative consequences of resource advancement on the signatories’ treaty legal rights, like new land-use strategies and safety steps as perfectly as a new earnings-sharing method.

The new framework and critical takeaways

The outlines for both the Implementation Arrangement and Consensus Doc, if completely implemented, characterize a main change in resource administration in the territories covered by the agreements over the coming yrs. 

In accordance to the province the agreements are intended to set a route for upcoming progress that “will transform how the Province and To start with Nations steward land, water and sources with each other, and handle cumulative consequences in [Treaty 8 territory].”5 As a end result, proponents can hope consultation on cumulative impacts on treaty rights will be an express need when trying to find approvals the new regulatory regime will intention to assess cumulative impacts on First Nations’ treaty rights with some specificity and new mechanisms will be created to restrict the scope of advancement in which these impacts are discovered. 


While the predicted outcome might be responsive to the court’s course in Yahey, in the brief time period the agreements risk developing some regulatory uncertainty for marketplace as the precise facts of the new framework will need to have to be made in the coming decades. Considerably:

  • the scope and situations underneath which long term growth may possibly arise are not completely regarded at this stage
  • it is unclear at this time how the 750-hectare cap will be allotted or how the footprint of proposed  developments will be calculated and
  • the implications (direct or consequential) for advancement on private land continues to be to be viewed as the many contemplated Watershed Administration Basin Ideas are applied.

The total implications of the agreements declared by British Columbia on useful resource improvement and management inside of the province remain to be viewed. It is worth noting that in the Yahey litigation that led to the province’s selection to seek a negotiated resolution for addressing concerns linked to cumulative impacts from industrial progress, the province did not argue the alleged infringements were being justified, nor did it appeal the trial court’s final decision. As a result, there is nevertheless minor guidance that may indicate how courts in other jurisdictions in Canada, appellate or normally, would rule on the situation of cumulative impacts.