BC’s changing regulatory landscape: BC and Treaty 8 First Nations negotiate collaborative approach to address cumulative effects of resource development | Canada | Global law firm

British Columbia has declared that, following 2021’s Yahey v British Columbia1 decision, it has reached agreements with five Treaty 8 Initial Nations over the province’s administration of purely natural sources. The agreements, which have not but been introduced, signal sizeable alterations to how future resource advancement will arise in the province in each the in close proximity to time period and in the decades ahead.


The important qualifications – 2021 British Columbia Supreme Courtroom conclusion

The agreements are the result of negotiations arising from the 2021 British Columbia Supreme Courtroom conclusion in which Blueberry River Initial Country productively sued British Columbia, a determination the province chose not to appeal. 

In that decision, the courtroom was hugely important of several elements of the province’s regulatory routine and concluded that cumulative results from industrial improvement experienced seriously undermined Blueberry River’s treaty legal rights, leaving them with no significant capacity to workout their Treaty 8 legal rights in their regular territory. Specially, the courtroom observed the province’s regulatory processes did not sufficiently take into consideration, or talk to on, cumulative impacts, nor ended up there meaningful enforcement mechanisms to restrict improvement to shield Blueberry River’s treaty rights from those people impacts. The court purchased British Columbia and Blueberry River to act with diligence to negotiate on a collaborative approach to useful resource administration that addresses cumulative results. 

The agreements introduced are the end result of these negotiations as nicely as additional negotiations with four other Treaty 8 Initially Nations: Fort Nelson, Saulteau, Halfway River and Doig River To start with Nations. The province has mentioned conversations are ongoing with 3 other Treaty 8 First Nations: West Moberly Initial Country, Prophet River 1st Country, and the McLeod Lake Indian Band.

Whilst far more information are to be announced in excess of the coming months, the agreements’ standard outlines have now been created community. 

Blueberry River Initial Nations Implementation Settlement2

On January 18, 2023, British Columbia announced the Blueberry River To start with Nations Implementation Agreement (Implementation Agreement) that consists of both of those a financial part for remediation and reclamation activities as very well as a framework for taking care of resources going ahead.

Significantly, the Implementation Agreement commits to:

  • shorter term limits on development in Treaty 8 lands when a regime for the extensive-phrase administration of cumulative results is implemented
  • caps on new land disturbances in just the Blueberry River’s territory (to a most of 750 hectares on a yearly basis)developing an “ecosystem management approach” to land use scheduling and forestry
  • employing “land protections” (such as previous forest advancement protection) covering a lot more than 650,000 hectares in Blueberry River’s substantial-value places
  • finishing a number of watershed-level land use plans in the next 3 many years
  • co-administration of wildlife, which includes moose management in distinct and
  • letting a established of large-benefit programs concentrated on petroleum and organic gasoline (PNG) sector activities to be finished in 15 months. 

For PNG especially, the Implementation Settlement also anticipates collaboration involving the province, businesses, Blueberry River and other nations for enhancement strategies with actions to incorporate:

  • establishing locations for long term defense from new advancement
  • focusing disturbance from PNG where ever possible in areas presently developed
  • cutting down new disturbance from PNG by roughly 50{6d6906d986cb38e604952ede6d65f3d49470e23f1a526661621333fa74363c48} from pre-court choice several years
  • introducing operational and strategic arranging anticipations for the sector, relevant to all new proposed actions and
  • restricting all round new disturbance from PNG things to do in Blueberry River’s declare region, specified at 750 hectares, as additional in depth planning and restoration pursuits can be produced and agreed to.3 

The Implementation Settlement also provides an $87.5 million money bundle to Blueberry River and a $200 million land restoration fund, as properly as contemplating oil and gas royalty earnings sharing with Blueberry River.

Even though the Implementation Settlement is not nevertheless community, the Oil and Gas Fee of British Columbia has currently issued a specific summary of its implications for PNG improvement. 

Consensus Doc

On January 20, 2023, British Columbia announced it had attained consensus with four other Treaty 8 Initially Nations “on a collaborative method to land and source organizing, and to progress regional options to reward all people residing in northeastern B.C. and Treaty 8 territory.”4 This co-designed established of initiatives, termed the “Consensus Document,” equally commit the province to employ measures to tackle the cumulative consequences of resource advancement on the signatories’ treaty legal rights, like new land-use strategies and safety steps as perfectly as a new earnings-sharing method.

The new framework and critical takeaways

The outlines for both the Implementation Arrangement and Consensus Doc, if completely implemented, characterize a main change in resource administration in the territories covered by the agreements over the coming yrs. 

In accordance to the province the agreements are intended to set a route for upcoming progress that “will transform how the Province and To start with Nations steward land, water and sources with each other, and handle cumulative consequences in [Treaty 8 territory].”5 As a end result, proponents can hope consultation on cumulative impacts on treaty rights will be an express need when trying to find approvals the new regulatory regime will intention to assess cumulative impacts on First Nations’ treaty rights with some specificity and new mechanisms will be created to restrict the scope of advancement in which these impacts are discovered. 

Takeaways

While the predicted outcome might be responsive to the court’s course in Yahey, in the brief time period the agreements risk developing some regulatory uncertainty for marketplace as the precise facts of the new framework will need to have to be made in the coming decades. Considerably:

  • the scope and situations underneath which long term growth may possibly arise are not completely regarded at this stage
  • it is unclear at this time how the 750-hectare cap will be allotted or how the footprint of proposed  developments will be calculated and
  • the implications (direct or consequential) for advancement on private land continues to be to be viewed as the many contemplated Watershed Administration Basin Ideas are applied.

The total implications of the agreements declared by British Columbia on useful resource improvement and management inside of the province remain to be viewed. It is worth noting that in the Yahey litigation that led to the province’s selection to seek a negotiated resolution for addressing concerns linked to cumulative impacts from industrial progress, the province did not argue the alleged infringements were being justified, nor did it appeal the trial court’s final decision. As a result, there is nevertheless minor guidance that may indicate how courts in other jurisdictions in Canada, appellate or normally, would rule on the situation of cumulative impacts. 

Cumulative effects of human footprint, natural features and predation risk best predict seasonal resource selection by white-tailed deer

  • Eisner, R., Seabrook, L. M. & McAlpine, C. A. Are changes in global oil production influencing the rate of deforestation and biodiversity loss?. Biol. Conserv. 196, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.017 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/132419 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfeifer, M. et al. Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24457 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tilman, D., May, R., Lehman, C. & Nowak, M. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/371065a0 (1994).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Burton, C. A. Wildlife winners and losers in an oil sands landscape. Front Ecol. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1807 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heim, N., Fisher, J. T., Volpe, J., Clevenger, A. P. & Paczkowski, J. Carnivore community response to anthropogenic landscape change: species-specificity foils generalizations. Landscape Ecol. 34, 2493–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00882-z (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. & Martins, I. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northrup, J. M., Anderson, C. R. Jr. & Wittemyer, G. Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer. Glob Change Biol. 21, 3961–3970. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13037 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holbrook, S. J. & Schmitt, R. J. The combined effects of predation risk and food reward on patch selection. Ecology 69, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943167 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moody, A. L., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. Ideal free distributions under predation risk. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 131–143 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dietz, H. & Edwards, P. J. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87, 1359–1367 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hobbs, R. J. & Huenneke, L. F. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6, 324–337 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van der Graaf, S., Stahl, J., Klimkowska, A. & Drent, J. P. B. Surfing on a green wave—How plant growth drives spring migration in the Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis. Ardea -Wageningen- 94, 567 (2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Parker, I. M. et al. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010034312781 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shackelford, N. et al. Primed for change: developing ecological restoration for the 21st Century. Restor. Ecol. 21, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12012 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pickell, P. D., Pickell, P. D., Andison, D. W., Coops, N. C. & Gergel, S. E. The spatial patterns of anthropogenic disturbance in the western Canadian boreal forest following oil and gas development. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0546 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Wilkinson, L. The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mammal Rev. 35, 51–81 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wittische, J., Heckbert, S., James, P. M. A., Burton, A. C. & Fisher, J. T. Community-level modelling of boreal forest mammal distribution in an oil sands landscape. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 142500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142500 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hewitt, D. G. Biology and management of white-tailed deer (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCabe, R. E. & McCabe, T. R. in White tailed deer: ecology and management Ch. Chapter 2, 19–72 (Stackpole, A Wildlife Management Institute Book, 1984).

  • Webb, R. The range of white-tailed deer in Alberta (Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division Edmonton, Alberta, 1967).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawe, K. L. & Boutin, S. Climate change is the primary driver of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) range expansion at the northern extent of its range; land use is secondary. Ecol. Evol. 6, 6435–6451. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2316 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeCesare, N. J., Hebblewhite, M., Robinson, H. S. & Musiani, M. Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation. Anim. Conserv. 13, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00328.x (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A. D. M., Latham, M. C., McCutchen, N. A. & Boutin, S. Invading white-tailed deer change wolf-caribou dynamics in northeastern Alberta. J. Wildl. Manag. 75, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.28 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A. D. M., Latham, M. C., Boyce, M. C. & Boutin, S. Movement responses by wolves to industrial linear features and their effect on woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Ecol. Appl. 21, 11 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T., Burton, A. C., Nolan, L. & Roy, L. Influences of landscape change and winter severity on invasive ungulate persistence in the Nearctic boreal forest. Sci. Rep. 10, 8742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65385-3 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dabros, A., Pyper, M. & Castilla, G. Seismic lines in the boreal and arctic ecosystems of North America: environmental impacts, challenges, and opportunities. Environ. Rev. 26, 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2017-0080 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dickie, M., Serrouya, R., McNay, R. S., Boutin, S. & du Toit, J. Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features and implications for hunting behaviour. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12732 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finnegan, L., MacNearney, D. & Pigeon, K. E. Divergent patterns of understory forage growth after seismic line exploration: implications for caribou habitat restoration. For. Ecol. Manag. 409, 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.010 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prokopenko, C. M., Boyce, M. S., Avgar, T. & Tulloch, A. Characterizing wildlife behavioural responses to roads using integrated step selection analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12768 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waring, G. H., Griffis, J. L. & Vaughn, M. E. White-tailed deer roadside behavior, wildlife warning reflectors, and highway mortality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 29, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90249-W (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bowman, J., Ray, J. C., Magoun, A. J., Johnson, D. S. & Dawson, F. N. Roads, logging, and the large-mammal community of an eastern Canadian boreal forest. Can. J. Zool. 88, 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1139/z10-019 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munro, K. G., Bowman, J. & Fahrig, L. Effect of paved road density on abundance of white-tailed deer. Wildl. Res. 39, 478. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr11152 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, J. T. & Burton, A. C. Spatial structure of reproductive success infers mechanisms of ungulate invasion in Nearctic boreal landscapes. Ecol. Evol. 11, 900–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7103 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kie, J. G. Optimal foraging and risk of predation effects on behavior and social structure in ungulates. J. Mammal. 80, 1114–1129 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, J. S., Laundré, J. W. & Gurung, M. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal. 80, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383287 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittle, A. M., Fryxell, J. M., Desy, G. E. & Hamr, J. The scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates. Oecologia 157, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1051-9 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moen, A. N. Energy conservation by white-tailed deer in the winter. Ecology 57, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936411 (1976).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt, K. Winter ecology of nonmigratory Alpine red deer. Oecologia 95, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323494 (1993).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kilgo, J. C., Ray, H. S., Vukovich, M., Goode, M. J. & Ruth, C. Predation by coyotes on white-tailed deer neonates in South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.393 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laurent, M., Dickie, M., Becker, M., Serrouya, R. & Boutin, S. Evaluating the mechanisms of landscape change on white-tailed deer populations. J. Wildl. Manag. 85, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21979 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider, R. R., Hauer, G., Adamowicz, W. L. & Boutin, S. Triage for conserving populations of threatened species: the case of woodland caribou in Alberta. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.002 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kilkenny, C., Browne Wj Fau – Cuthill, I. C., Cuthill Ic Fau – Emerson, M., Emerson M Fau – Altman, D. G. & Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS biol. 8(6), e1000412 (2010).

  • DelGiudice, G. D., Mangipane, B. A., Sampson, B. A. & Kochanny, C. O. Chemical immobilization, body temperature, and post-release mortality of white-tailed deer captured by clover trap and net-gun. Wildl. Soc. Bull. (1973-2006) 29, 1147–1157 (2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Droge, E., Creel, S., Becker, M. S. & M’Soka, J. Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0220-9 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunkel, K. E. & Mech, L. D. Wolf and bear predation on white-tailed deer fawns in northeastern Minnesota. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1557–1565 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latham, A., Latham, M., Knopff, K., Hebblewhite, M. & Boutin, S. Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: Implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00035.x (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. Alberta Vegetation Index. Accessed October 2016. https://geodiscover.alberta.ca/

  • Manly, B., McDonald, L., Thomas, D., McDonald, T. & Erickson, W.Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Vol. 63, pp. 1-10 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).

  • Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E. & Schmiegelow, F. K. A. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 157, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hijmans, R. & van Etten, J. Raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. CRAN R package 2 (2016).

  • R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Vienna, Austria, 2013).

  • Zuur, A., Hilbe, J. & Ieno, E. A Beginner’s Guide to GLM and GLMM with R: a frequentist and Bayesian perspective for ecologists. (Highland Statistics, 2013).

  • Gillies, C. S. et al. Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01106.x (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Craney, T. A. & Surles, J. G. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual. Eng. 14, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Selected papers of hirotugu akaike 199–213 (Springer, New York, 1998).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 (2004).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boulanger, Y. et al. Climate change impacts on forest landscapes along the Canadian southern boreal forest transition zone. Landscape Ecol. 32, 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0421-7 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sulla-Menashe, D., Woodcock, C. E. & Friedl, M. A. Canadian boreal forest greening and browning trends: an analysis of biogeographic patterns and the relative roles of disturbance versus climate drivers. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9b88 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • St-Pierre, F., Drapeau, P. & St-Laurent, M.-H. Drivers of vegetation regrowth on logging roads in the boreal forest: Implications for restoration of woodland caribou habitat. For. Ecol. Manag. 482, 118846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118846 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berger, J. Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biol. Let. 3, 620–623. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0415 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heyes, A., Leach, A. & Mason, C. F. The economics of Canadian oil sands. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 12, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey006 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Komers, P. E. & Stanojevic, Z. Rates of disturbance vary by data resolution: implications for conservation schedules using the Alberta boreal forest as a case study. Global Change Biol. 19, 2916–2928 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hebblewhite, M. & Merrill, E. H. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90, 3445–3454. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2090.1 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mech, D. L. & Boitani, L. Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation Vol. 57 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Creel, S., Winnie, J. A., Christianson, D. & Liley, S. Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk. Anim. Behav. 76, 1139–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steenweg, R. et al. Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet’s biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1448 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hebblewhite, M. Billion dollar boreal woodland caribou and the biodiversity impacts of the global oil and gas industry. Biol. Cons. 206, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.014 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C. & Waller, D. M. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 113–147 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCullough, D. R. Evaluation of night spotlighting as a deer study technique. J. Wildl. Manag. 46, 963–973. https://doi.org/10.2307/3808229 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preston, T., Wildhaber, M., Green, N., Albers, J. & Debenedetto, G. Enumerating white-tailed deer using unmanned aerial vehicles. Wildlife Soc. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1149 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parks, A. E. Provincial woodland caribou range plan. 212 (Edmonton, Alberta, 2017).

  • Tattersall, E. R., Burgar, J. M., Fisher, J. T. & Burton, A. C. Boreal predator co-occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1678–1691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6028 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (New York N.Y.) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bayoumi, T. & Muhleisen, M. Energy, the exchange rate, and the economy: macroeconomic benefits of Canada’s oil sands production (International Monetary Fund, Washington, 2006).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhu, K., Song, Y. & Qin, C. Forest age improves understanding of the global carbon sink. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 3962. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900797116 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar